Application and API penetration testing answers one question: can this specific system be broken into? A security audit asks a broader one — is the way this business is configured, structured, and run actually defensible, beyond any one application?

This service covers infrastructure and cloud configuration, security architecture, and the policies and processes around them — the audit an enterprise client, investor, or insurer is usually really asking for when they say "do you have a security audit."

Who this is for

Teams preparing for a funding round, enterprise sales cycle, or insurance underwriting that requires a documented security posture.
Businesses running cloud infrastructure (AWS, GCP, Azure, or managed hosting) that has never had an independent configuration review.
Organisations that have grown past ad-hoc access and need a documented, defensible security architecture.

What gets reviewed

Audit Area	What Is Examined
Cloud & Infrastructure Configuration	IAM policies, network segmentation, storage bucket permissions, secrets management, logging and alerting coverage.
Security Architecture	Trust boundaries, defense-in-depth layering, and whether the system design itself limits blast radius when a single control fails.
Access & Identity	Least-privilege enforcement, offboarding hygiene, and admin/root account sprawl.
Process & Policy	Whether documented security policies exist, are followed in practice, and match how the team actually operates.
Incident Readiness	Whether a breach-response plan exists and has been tested, not just written.

How this differs from the other services

Web & API Security Assessment tests one application or API for exploitable vulnerabilities. Security Audits steps back to the infrastructure and organisational level around it. Most established teams benefit from both, scoped separately: the audit sets direction, the assessment verifies specific systems.

The boundary: permission before testing

RULES OF ENGAGEMENT

No engagement begins without a signed scope defining exactly which infrastructure, accounts, and environments are in scope, the review window, and the escalation contact. Any hands-on testing component stays non-destructive and inside the agreed scope as a matter of policy, not negotiation.

What you receive

Findings register: configuration and architecture issues with severity and evidence.
Plain-language risk summary: written for a board, investor, or non-technical stakeholder.
Prioritised remediation roadmap: ranked by risk against effort, ready to execute.

How engagements start: the 48-Hour Secure Digital Workflow Assessment

Most clients begin with the 48-Hour Secure Digital Workflow Assessment, delivered jointly with HarLyn Digital Partners, which establishes the current-state map and identifies whether a full security audit is warranted.

START HERE

Engagements begin with a fixed-scope scoping call. Clear decisions before code, and no obligation to proceed to follow-on build work.

Request a Scoping Call →